[a. F. complexion (13th c. in Littré), ad. L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7194/d7194e20959a6b020c63fc721c39ffdd66c4c5dd" alt="{omac}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c01/f3c01fa61543849641ffc757f0cb3b2aca5090e3" alt="{ebreve}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c01/f3c01fa61543849641ffc757f0cb3b2aca5090e3" alt="{ebreve}"
BellumLetters
It is admittedly not much of a choice if one has to deny part of one’s self to gain privilege. However, privilege can still exist, even if “choice” is denial. For example: if I “choose” to publish under a different name, say, “Mike Jones,” my words as “Mike Jones” have more privilege than my words as a female-of-color. “Mike Jones” has the privilege of invisibility, of nondifference. “Mike Jones” does not have to send his words through tokenism. His words would not be parsed through cultural lenses or be automatically associated with visual difference. Nor would he be judged on his difference. To gain Mike Jones’ privilege, I have to deny everything that I am. But if I did, his privilege nonetheless operates for me.
and then
i always feel uncomfortable when i think about my whiteness and how i came to be where i am.
but maybe i just wanted to say that. that i'm uncomfortable and having feelings about the subject and that i don't know everything about what they are yet but, wow, i'm so glad some people are saying something.
This is a dangerous assumption, for Third World conditions exist in North America, in North American countries that are not Canada and the USA, among Native Hawaiians and the First Peoples of Canada, on Native American reservations, in urban, inner cities, in rural and agricultural settings. I suspect that women in these communities do not have access to the feminism which exists in white American middle class households and their corresponding professional workplaces and educational institutions.
& later...
I am critical of the assumption that “innovative” poetry coming from these “other” places will abide by the same standards by which “white,” “avant garde” American poetry abides; I find this problematic precisely because these standards are determined by this same “avant garde.”